6. No mosque at Ground Zero

This is a reaction to Pat Condell's video. 

Pat admits that he lacks knowledge. I try to inform him.

The Islamisation of Europe?

You make it sound as if the muslims invaded our countries. They did not.

They did not even come uninvited, like the jews did when they entered all nations of the world.

No, Pat. We invited them.

We went to Morocco and Turkey and invited the muslims to come to us and work in our factories. They did not come on their own initiative.

That’s how the muslims came to Germany, Holland, Belgium etc.

With France and England it may be a little different.

France and England have colonised a lot of muslim countries and that started muslim immigration to their countries.

The first muslims came in the sixties.

Once they were here, it were the jewish Scientists and jewish Media who created the Politically Correct doctrine that all people were the same, and that objection to immigration was the first step on the way to a new Auschwitz.  I posted a video  about this.

In the years that mass-immigration took place, your jewish heroes, Pat,  were able to prevent any debate and keep the gates open.

The only reproach you may make to the muslims is that they left their country of birth and went to another country where the gras was greener.  But America is filled with people who did the same, in earlier times.

Your anger should be directed to those who created the climate of Political Correctness.  

Political Correctness was (of course ) a jewish invention of the Frankfurter School.
As a matter of fact, David Horowitz ( the man who started muslim bashing in the States) was also a man who started Political Correctness. He inspired all the Lefties that you hate, Pat.

Here you can hear Horowitz himself,  confirming what I write. 

Here you can hear about Adorno who invented the taboo on 'prejudice' ..... which made it impossible to criticise mass immigration. 


Another source about Political Correctness: Valdas Anelauskas.
A fine definition of Political Correctness.

The islamisation of America ?

The moslim-bashers were so succesful to scare Americans for the muslims that the people of Oklahoma demanded a law that would make it impossible that the Sharia would ever in the future be introduced in their state.

Was this a realistic fear of the Oklahomians?  

Not if you know that only 6000 Oklahomians are muslim, one in every 650 people.

The Washington Post did a huge investigation  to find out how the bussiness of ‘intelligence’ had grown after 911.

The answer is that they have one secret service agent for every 2 muslims in the US. 

Are they that afraid of muslims, Pat,  or is there another strategy behind this ?

You may lack knowledge, but now that I give you the numbers, what do you think ?

An estimated 854,000 people hold top-secret security clearances. 

On a population of  307 million that is 0,3 %.  

In the US 0,6 % of the population is muslim.

About 911.

Pat, you still accuse the moslims of 911, but this is almost impossible. 

The evidence for that is overwhelming. 

I have 3 jews who are convinced ( and dare to say it) that Israel and jews were the ones who must have done it. Here too the evidence is abundant.   

So reality is much more spectacular than you think: it was jews who did 911, and it is jews that started this Ground Zero Mosque hype.

All the time the muslims are the victims.

About the ‘Cordoba House’.

Pat, you say that the Muslims conquered Spain, and that the Cordoba mosque was a symbol of their conquest.

Lacking knowledge serves you well, Pat. 

If you would have knowledge, it would look different: 

Benjamin Disraeli, a former prime minister of England, jewish by race,  and an admirer and defender of the jews, wrote this in his book “Lord George Bentick”, written in  1852, on page 327, 

That it were the Spanish Jews who asked the muslims to come over to Spain and help them to keep the country in their power.  

Again: a jewish initiative for agression, not a muslim one.

You see that your jewish friends are flexible, Pat.

It is not always 'devide and conquer'. 

Many times they 'ally and conquer.' 

Mostly they allied with  the rulers, as in Poland between 1500 and 1800, for instance. 

About that period the famous historian Fernand Braudel wrote:

( in La Mediterrannée.. pag 137 :)  

"In Poland, which burst suddenly into modernity at the beginning of the fifteenth century, there is a growing jewish ascendance, the result of numbers, and almost a jewish nation and state…."  

These 300 years of European history ( OK, only 1/3 of Europe ) is nowhere to be found in the history books, Pat. 

Here your lack of knowledge may be excused.  

Here is the exact quote from Disraeli's book: 

 The Gothic tribes, very recently converted to their Syrian faith (= Christianity), were full of barbaric zeal against those whom they looked upon as the enemies of Jesus. But the Spanish Jews sought assistance from their kinsmen the Saracens (= Moors) on the opposite coast; Spain was invaded and subdued by the Moors, and for several centuries the Jew and the Saracen lived under the same benignant laws and shared the same brilliant prosperity. In the history of Spain during the Saracenic supremacy any distinction of religion or race is no longer traced.

5 Lets blame the jews ... for the holocaust industry.

Jews always proclaim that 'freedom of speech' is very important to them.

Yes, except for the discussion on the question 'How did the holocaust happen. How many were killed? How were they killed ?'
And: 'Was this genocide different from the genocide in the Ukraïne, in the Gulag, in Armnenia ? '

Those who want to speak about this are immediately demonised: accused of being holocaust deniers.

Only very few of them deny the holocaust.
The only thing they want to know is: what did happen, and what did not happen ?

Twenty years ago there was a young jewish investigator, David Cole.
He went to Auschwitz to look for answers.

He found out that there was no proof of gaschambers in Auschwitz.
On the contrary: he found a lot of lies being told, and misleading of the public.
He found a lying director of Auschwitz.
He found blue stained walls ( from Zyklon B ) in delousing baracks, 50 years after the war, but never a gaschamber that had blue walls.

He learned that shortly after the war it was common knowledge that there had been gaschambers in more than 20 camps.  But years later it was down to 5 camps.

He learned of the numerous eye-witnesses that had seen the gaschambers...... mostly in camps where, as we know now for certain, there have never been gaschambers. ( This is agreed upon by all scholars.)

Here is the documentary that Cole made in Auschwitz, in 1992. ( 60 minutes)

A few years later the very influential and popular  Phil Donahue invited Cole on his show.
Cole was there together with a man Bradley Smith who also took the stance that it is necessary to have some proof about the holocaust before taking this as a certain fact.
Here is the very interesting and revealing Phil Donahue Show. ( about 60 minutes)


The jewish ADL wanted Cole dead.

The last that was heard from Cole was a letter in which he wrote that his ideas about Auschwitz had been wrong. Since 1998 no one has aver heard from or seen Cole again.

On the Dutch Wikipedia  we still can read about him:
 The Jewish Defense League promised a reward for information on the whereabouts of David Cole. Later David Cole dissociates himself in a letter from his former position on the Holocaust. There is much speculation about this letter, because since the publication no trace is from David Cole has been seen.

It also gives the whole documentary in written words. 
And 46 questions posed by David Cole.

In the English Wikipedia we find no trace of the David Cole that gave us such a remarkable view on history and what we know (or want to know) about it.

-------------------

Raul Hilberg.

Raul Hilberg is the Israeli scientist considered the most authoritative on the holocaust.
I respect him because he openly supported Norman Finkelstein and agreed that the Holocaust was used as a tool, that it had become an industry.

But this respect completely disappears when we see that he used the Gerstein Report as his main proof for the gaschambers.
Gerstein was a German military man who was responsable for the distribution of Zyklon B to the concentrationcamps.
Gerstein has stated that this Zyklon B was used to gas people.
This statement of Gerstein is one of the very few 'proofs' for the gaschambers.
( All the ex-prisoners who tell about having seen the gaschambers are unreliable: most opf them saw gaschambers in camps where there definitely never were any.  Shortly after the war it was believed that there were gaschambers in about 20 camps.  Now it is believed there were only 5 camps with gaschambers.)
So Hilberg believes Gerstein.
But Gerstein writes  a lot of other things in his Report that show us that he was very unreliably !

On the Ernst Zundel trial  prof. Hilberg admitted that he only believed Gerstein on the statements that supported his theory about the gaschambers. Here is more.


 

4 Lets blame it on the jews.... 911

Pat Condell believes that jews did not do 911.

But here are three jews ( who are not light on the details, as Condell admits he is) who are convinced that jews did 911.

The first one is Dr. Alan Sabrosky.
Sabrosky teached at a few universities, and was director of Studies at the US Army War College.
He is convinced that Israel is the only possible answer to the question: "Who did 911?"
Here is a fine interview with Sabrosky. (best option)
Here is an article by Sabrosky.
Here is a video.


The second one is Eric Hufschmidt.
He is of varying quality, but mostly quite interesting to read.
Here he writes about 911.

The third jew who says that Israel did 911 is a jew that turned to christianity: Brother Naftanael.
He acts a bit stupid, but he has an awful lot of good information on his website.
He is definitely not as foolish as he may look.
Here is his stance on jews and 911.

--

One more jewish man, Aaron Russo ( manager of Rock Groups, film maker, candidate for governor of Nevada,  jew) 'spills the beans'....

well, he says that Nick Rockefeller told him ( in october 2000) a lot of remarkable things.

Russo was asked ( recruited) by Rockefeller to become a 'tool' to mislead the people.

Some quotes:
About Rockefeller and 911.
About the War on Terror.
About womens liberation.

It is possible that Russo was making these things up. But what motivation could he have? He had cancer and knew he would die soon.

3. Let's blame the jews. (Pat Condell)

Yes, Pat, let's try to blame the jews.

Your biggest problem seems to be the many muslims in your country and the terror that some muslims commit.

Have you got any idea how all these immigrants came into your country,  Pat?
Are you blaming 'the awful left-wingers', you say ?
And where did they get their ideas from?
How come this leftish - we are all the same, its a shame to discriminate other races - view on the world got so popular and influential?
Who propagated it?
Cui bono ? Or in plain english: who did benefit from mass immigration?

It was Franz Boas who invented anthropology, and more than that: he invented the idea that all people were very much the same. Differences among the races were only the result from differences in culture.
This lay the ground-work. It paved the way. (4)

Then came the sixties: The emancipation of the blacks in the US.
The NAACP was a jewish organisation !


But more than that.
Also the holocaust-industry started.
Untill the mid sixties Auschwitz was almost unknown. There were very very few books about the holocaust.
We all became familiar with the heaps of very skinny dead people in Bergen-Belsen, who died from typhus and exhaustion, as they had chosen to fly from more eastward camps to Bergen Belsen.  They voluntarily fled together with the German 'beasts' for the Russian liberators.
We were given the impression that all these poor people were gassed, but there were never any gaschambers in Bergen Belsen.

Auschwitz was strongly connected with the idea of discrimination.
All these 6 million jews died because of discrimination.

Suddenly it became impossible to object to immigration.
Such objection was immediately seen as evidence of discrimination.
Every politician who wanted to discuss immigration got ostracised and demonised.
It was the end of his career.
Also opinion-leaders, journalists and authors were no longer able to discuss the risks of mass immigration.

Stephen Jay Gould was able to convince every intellectual that IQ did not exist.
Richard Lewontin showed us that there was only one human race, as the differences between i.e. all white people were much bigger than the differences between the average black and the average white person. Race was an obsolete concept.

Now, if you look carefully, you will see that all these theorists were of jewish origin.

As Kevin MacDonald and others have shown it was always the jewish segment of the American society that was the fiercest ( and often the only) group that pleaded for free immigration. ( And still are)
Why ?
Simple. If you are a jew and constitute 2% of the country whereas the other 98 % are white christians, you have little chances to become 'chief'.
In 1964 the jewish lobby succeeded to break the resistance against immigration. Then about 80% of the USA was white. Now this has sunk to about 50%. (Percentages are a rough guess).
Already for several years the jews are the 'chiefs' in the USA.

'Devide and conquer' is the strategy.


So, my dear Pat,
you have a few contradictions in your worldview: You hate immigrant, but you love jews.
You lack the knowledge that it was the jews who succeeded in making our countries multi-ethnic.
(1) (2) (3)

And now they have changed their agenda's.
We will be multi-ethnic for ever, and weaker because of that.
Now your jewish friends have a new goal.
They want the freedom to kill muslims without being bothered about it.
That is why we had 911.
That is why in our media the muslim-bashing has taken such momentum.

I am afraid, dear Pat, that you are just doing what the jewish interests want you to do: bash muslims.

-----------------


On youtube I wrote this text to go with the video that I posted:
Here it is with links included. ( I will do that in a few days)


Pat Condell is defending the jews, and hates the many immigrants.
This is strange, because it has been the jewish pressure that made mass immigration possible.
This immigration is good for the jews and bad for the  non-jewish inhabitants of a country.

Hans Janmaat was a Dutch MP who criticised mass immigration since 1983.
The press vilified him. One time he was treated like shit by a jewish panel ( het zwarte schaap) because he discriminated people.
Janmaat died in 2002.

I voted for Janmaat.
I spoke to Pim Fortuyn a few months before he was murdered.
How far back does Condell's 'clairvoyance' go?  Did he risk being demonised  20 years ago, like me?

From what I read and lived through it is now my opinion that jewish influence in academia and in the Media can make a people believe whatever they want us to believe,  as Bertrand Russell once wrote.
First we were made to believe that opposing immigration was equal to being a fascist. Discrimination was the biggest sin possible.

Now that our countries are hopelessly multi-ethnic, we learn from 'The Masters
 of Discourse' that all people may be all equal, but the muslims are less equal.
They are dangerous and inferior.

If Israel were surrounded by Hindu countries and 'Greater Israël' were inhabited by Hindu's right now,
then  911 would have been perpetrated by Hindu's and we would all learn time and again how dangerous this religion was, and how inhuman their culture.
They burn their widows alive! They have untouchables ! Women are second class creatures !


                      ---------------------------------------------------

(1) Gelbaum (jewish bussiness man) gives 100 million $ to environment organisations on the condition that they will stop their opposition towards immigration, in 1994.  http://www.vdare.com/walker/050202_sierra.htm

(2) E.A. Ross writes in 1914 that it was overwhelmingly a jewish campaign to plea for immigration:

"Although theirs is but a seventh of our net immigration, they led the fight on the Immigration Commission’s bill. The power of the million Jews in the Metropolis lined up the Congressional delegation from New York in solid opposition to the literacy test. The systematic campaign in newspapers and magazines to break down all arguments for restriction and to calm nativist fears is waged by and for one race. Hebrew money is behind the National Liberal Immigration League and its numerous publications. From the paper before the commercial body or the scientific association to the heavy treatise produced with the aid of the Baron de Hirsch Fund, the literature that proves the blessings of immigration to all classes in America emanates from subtle Hebrew brains." (E. A. Ross, The Old World and the New: The Significance of Past and Present Immigration to the American People. 1914, 144–145)

From:  http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-KaufmannII.html#JI

(3) David Duke: Chapter 24:   http://www.davidduke.com/general/my-awakening-chapter-24-the-jewish-role-in-immigration_2518.html

(4) By 1915 the Boasians controlled the American Anthropological Association and held a two-thirds majority on its Executive Board. By 1926 every major department of anthropology was headed by Boas’s students, the majority of whom were Jewish. 

From:  http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-KaufmannII.html#JI

2. Pat Condell.

I, Hans Janmaat,will use this blog to react to some video’s from Pat Condell.

Who is Pat Cndell?

He is a Brittish comedian who makes political statements on youtube.

But what Pat l;acks is information.

On his website, in the “about me” section, Pat complains abpout this lack of knowledge.

As I don’t have a lack of knowledge I decided to help Pat on his way.

Here is Pat’s  “about me” page as it looks today:  ( the yellow marking was done by me.)

My name is Patrick, and I’m a biped carbon-based life form. 
In my spare time I enjoy walking upright and being warm-blooded, and I’m a Scorpio. 
I live here...


...on planet Earth, a piece of rock orbiting a giant fireball in the middle of nowhere. 
I feel I belong here. 
There’s something about the atmosphere. 
It suits me down to the ground. 
The surface of the planet is about 70% water, which is nice because I’m about 70% water myself. 
I share the remaining 30% with six billion others, each of whom has a 70% water body of their own. 
Each of these bodies, like the planet, is composed of tiny particles which, on close examination, appear to have no solidity, but rather are pure energy. 
And since they comprise everything in our world and our universe, this means we’re not solid either, nor is the planet. 

 

What more can I tell you? I like beer and chillies, football and Bob Dylan. 
And I don’t have much of a formal education – which is good, because it means I can actually read and write. But it also means I don’t have a great deal of what you might call actual knowledge. 
However, if you pressed me, I’d say the purpose of life is joy in the present moment, and anyone who tells you different is a lying conniving asshole. 
Cheerio.
 

• HOME > 
 
• ABOUT ME > 

Hans Janmaat

Hans Janmaat was a Dutch member of parliament between 1982 and 1998. He died in 2002.
Janmaat was the only politician who said right from the beginning in 1982: "There are too many immigrants. We should restrain immigration."

Janmaat was vilified.
Janmaat was demonised.
Janmaat was proclaimed a racist.

He was no more a racist than a normal person is a racist: he preferred his own people above strangers. Nowadays every evolutionary psychologist can tell you that this is what ALL normal people feel.
But it was a cardinal sin , in those PC days.

I remember having voted for Janmaat once.
I considered the rapid immigration a time-bomb, and all other politicians refused to discuss this.
That is why I voted for Janmaat.

In 1991 I left the political party of which I was a member, because they refused to discuss the immigration and the problems resulting from it, for immigrants as well as for the host population.

Years later, in 2002,   I sympathised with Pim Fortuyn, and had a short personal conversation, in february of 2002. On the 6th of may  he was assasinated.
The next day I went to his house and lay flowers at the gate, as did thousands of people that day.

All  this I am telling you to show that I saw the problems that arise from turning a uni-racial, uni-cultural society into a multi-racial and multicultural one.
It causes enormous problems and human suffering, as it did in all those countries that are multi racial or multicultural.
Think of the Muslims and Hindu's in India,
the Hutu's and Tutsi's in Rwanda,
the Wallons and the Flemish in Belgium,
the Basks and the Spanish,
the Kurds and the Turkish,
the Serbs and the muslims in Yugoslavia
the Alevites and the Sunni's in Syria,
etc. etc. etc.

What is so great about making our country multi-ethnic and multi religious ?

This subject was taboo.

Why?

Who made it a taboo?

How did they do it ?

What was their goal ?

I found that out in the last few years, and I will tell you about it.